Traditional vs. Lump Sum Relocation Programs
Which is best model for your company?
There is more than one way to get your relocating employees to their new assignments. Many companies opt for either a traditional relocation program, a lump sum/managed cap program, or a combination of the two, depending on the position of the transferee and other special circumstances.
What are the Differences?
With a lump sum or managed cap model, relocating employees are given a pre-determined amount of money to cover all aspects of their move. From the shipping of goods to temporary housing, the transferees are responsible for researching and obtaining all the services needed to get them to their new destinations. There is no tracking or reporting available to HR or finance departments to let them know whether their relocation policies are too generous, costing the company more money than necessary to relocate their employees, or too limited, forcing transferees to pay out of pocket unnecessarily. This approach leaves the entire move is managed by the transferees, many who might not have any prior moving experience.
Conversely, a traditional relocation model is managed by a relocation management company (RMC). The RMC coordinates everything for the transferees. This includes, but is not limited to, home selling, household goods movement, temporary living, and home purchasing. The RMC sets up the various services with reputable, vetted network partners. Since the RMCs use direct billing back to the client companies, the transferees rarely have to open their wallets. HR and finance departments receive detailed expense reports from the RMCs that capture all the costs related to relocating their transferees.
Based on comprehensive relocation surveys, here are findings of how companies in five different industries utilize either traditional, managed cap/lump sum, or a combination of these relocation programs:
The figures above illustrate that across all the industries in this survey, traditional relocation programs are used more frequently than lump sum or managed cap programs. However, in all the industries, there is a large percentage of companies that utilize a combined approach. A best practice consideration is to adopt a combination of traditional and managed cap relocation models.
Modern Mobility Made Easy™
Helping you manage your relocating employees
Global Mobility Solutions, an innovative leader in corporate relocations since 1987, can analyze and create mobility management programs customized for your unique needs. Additionally, we have compiled benchmarking studies and relocation best practices for numerous industries. To learn more about what type of relocation model would fit best with your company, get the full relocation benchmarking study for your specific industry:
Ann Knapp | CRP, GMS, CMC
Director, Transportation Services Ann has over 20 years of leadership experience in the moving and relocation industries. She is a council member for the International Association of Movers (IAM) Leadership Alliance. As a 2nd generation mover, Ann has worked in all areas of the industry from survey scheduling to claims settlement which has provided her with a well-rounded understanding of the ins & outs of moving. Ann is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Transportation Team, the GMS Transportation Network, managing contracts, policy advisement, and monitoring quality.
