Categories
Corporate Relocation Domestic Relocation Tips Global Relocation Relocation Policy Review Relocation Programs

Relocation Policy Benchmarking Delivers Results

As your company enters 2021, you should use relocation policy benchmarking to deliver much-needed results right from the start. The mobility industry strongly recommends that employers conduct a comparative policy review at an interval of 12 to 18 months. Waiting any longer to do this valuable exercise puts your company at great risk of losing significant ground to your industry competitors.

Do you think the relocation industry has not changed much in 12 months? Think again! The COVID-19 pandemic is still affecting all aspects of relocation. Whatever the issues are, a thorough relocation policy benchmarking will show you the solutions your company should implement.

Top 5 Results that Relocation Policy Benchmarking Delivers:

1. Increase Knowledge Across Your Organization

You must work with several internal stakeholders to implement successful relocations. All of these stakeholders should learn what is changing in the relocation industry. Cost issues, legal issues, and travel issues are still arising from the pandemic.

2. Examine Your Company’s Competitive Position Through Relocation Policy Benchmarking

How are your industry competitors using their relocation policies to attract and retain new hires and transferees? Relocation policy benchmarking provides clear information on how your industry peers leverage their relocation policies to succeed at talent acquisition and retention.

3. Adopt a Global Approach to Align Corporate Mobility Objectives

GMS has helped several companies avoid the pitfalls of decentralization. When companies take a decentralized approach to mobility, they end up with different policies and different experiences from location to location. Relocation policy benchmarking helps identify all of these differences. Recommendations to adopt the best solutions across the organization result in operational efficiencies, costs savings, and greater transferee satisfaction.

NOTE! View our Case Study on Decentralization. You will learn how we helped a large multinational client understand the benefits of a centralized approach for their relocation policies.

4. Innovative Solutions Solve Problems and Increase Efficiency

As fast as the world has changed over the past year, technology has changed at an even faster lightning speed. For example, conducting a relocation policy year end reconciliation can now be done in minutes with the touch of a few buttons. Relocation APIs such as those offered through GMS’ MyRelocation® Technology make managing your company’s relocation program a quick and easy process.

5. Save Costs with Relocation Policy Benchmarking

One of the biggest cost drivers for relocation policies are exceptions. By examining the best practices in your industry, your company can enhance your relocation policy to reduce these costly exceptions. Relocation policy benchmarking will identify cost issues and help your company institute solutions to keep costs and budgets in line.

What Should Employers Do?

Employers should initiate a relocation policy benchmarking with a qualified and knowledgeable Relocation Management Company (RMC). The project should include a full assessment of the company’s current relocation policy. It should also include a full review of corporate objectives and a complement of strategic recommendations.

Conclusion

Global Mobility Solutions’ team of corporate relocation experts has helped thousands of our clients understand why they should initiate a relocation policy benchmarking. We can help your company understand how to create a relocation policy that reflects industry best practices, saves costs, and increases efficiency.

GMS was the first relocation company to register as a “.com.” The company also created the first online interactive tools and calculators, and revolutionized the entire relocation industry. GMS continues to set the industry pace as the pioneer in innovation and technology solutions with its proprietary MyRelocation® technology platform.

Powered by GMS’ 2020 Mobility Benchmark, the innovative GMS Program/Policy Evaluation (PPE) Tool provides instant relocation policy reviews. It also helps users gain insight into how their company’s relocation program compares to their industry peers.

Schedule your relocation policy benchmarking now. Contact our experts online or give us a call at 800.617.1904 or 480.922.0700 today.

What's happening in your industry? Request a Courtesy Benchmark report

At GMS, we make it a priority to know how talent mobility is changing in each major industry. What are the best practices? How are other companies changing their programs to retain a competitive edge? Your Mobility Pro will be in touch within 1 business day to help answer your questions and benchmark your industry.

Categories
Corporate Relocation Corporate relocation tips Domestic Relocation Domestic Relocation Tips Domestic Relocation Trends Global Mobility Global Relocation Global Relocation Tips Global Relocation Trends Household Goods Relocation Best Practices Relocation Management

Relocation Models for 5 Major Industries

Traditional vs. Lump Sum Relocation Programs

Which is best model for your company?

There is more than one way to get your relocating employees to their new assignments. Many companies opt for either a traditional relocation program, a lump sum/managed cap program, or a combination of the two, depending on the position of the transferee and other special circumstances.

What are the Differences?

With a lump sum or managed cap model, relocating employees are given a pre-determined amount of money to cover all aspects of their move. From the shipping of goods to temporary housing, the transferees are responsible for researching and obtaining all the services needed to get them to their new destinations. There is no tracking or reporting available to HR or finance departments to let them know whether their relocation policies are too generous, costing the company more money than necessary to relocate their employees, or too limited, forcing transferees to pay out of pocket unnecessarily. This approach leaves the entire move is managed by the transferees, many who might not have any prior moving experience.

Conversely, a traditional relocation model is managed by a relocation management company (RMC). The RMC coordinates everything for the transferees. This includes, but is not limited to, home selling, household goods movement, temporary living, and home purchasing. The RMC sets up the various services with reputable, vetted network partners. Since the RMCs use direct billing back to the client companies, the transferees rarely have to open their wallets. HR and finance departments receive detailed expense reports from the RMCs that capture all the costs related to relocating their transferees.

Based on comprehensive relocation surveys, here are findings of how companies in five different industries utilize either traditional, managed cap/lump sum, or a combination of these relocation programs:

Relocation Models by Industry: Energy, Healthcare/Medical, Manufacturing, Retail, Technology

The figures above illustrate that across all the industries in this survey, traditional relocation programs are used more frequently than lump sum or managed cap programs. However, in all the industries, there is a large percentage of companies that utilize a combined approach. A best practice consideration is to adopt a combination of traditional and managed cap relocation models.

Modern Mobility Made Easy™
Helping you manage your relocating employees

Global Mobility Solutions, an innovative leader in corporate relocations since 1987, can analyze and create mobility management programs customized for your unique needs. Additionally, we have compiled benchmarking studies and relocation best practices for numerous industries. To learn more about what type of relocation model would fit best with your company, get the full relocation benchmarking study for your specific industry:

Download your industry benchmarking study

Looking for something?